Climate change skepticism is now misogyny

So, here we have an article claiming that climate change affects women more than men.

Of course it's written by the (far left-wing) conversation, so what else should I expect.

I guess if the life expectancy gap between men and women starts to close then we can attribute climate change as the cause.

Also, anyone now denying climate change will be also called a misogynist and racist (since it'll also affect poorer countries more than rich ones too).

So many racist, misogynist deniers out there...

Human chimerism - a false flag

In an interesting article about human chimerism in relation to a baby born whose DNA only matched 10% of his 'father's' they make a number of interesting claims about it:

• One minute the article states that "the geneticists are blown away by this", followed later by "chimera reports are rare", then blow those both away with "human chimerism is very common".  It's either common or it's rare, it can't be both.
• "Genetically the dad is his son's uncle" - wouldn't he have been his son's grandfather?  10% match is a number more closely associated with more distant relatives.  Did they bother to test any of the other males in the family?
• "Human chimerism isn't new though - it's been seen in shows like CSI and in real life cases".  Claiming it was the story on a TV show doesn't make it any more likely than seeing Jedi powers on Star Wars makes The Force any more real.

I'm all for the truth in genetic mutation and believe that it must exist, however I think this lack of real study is probably just going to fuel more and more cases of children's DNA not matching their father being blamed on "another case of chimerism" instead of what it is statistically more likely: pregnancy from infidelity.

Also, I was under the impression that chimerism was more likely to occur in women as their DNA is thought to be altered slightly with each baby they carry to term.  Of course, I don't see anyone reporting that information as widely as this potential get-out-of-infidelity chimerism stuff.

Supporting the SJW violence against women line will not offer protection from it

Here's a guy who is claiming he's being falsely accused of domestic violence against women.

Notice how being a White Ribbon Ambassador hasn't helped him avoid any of this.  Even if his name is "cleared", the accusations will hang around like a bad smell.

I wonder if anyone will publicly come to his defense or if he's completely tainted.  Also, if his accuser is found to have been making it up, if she'll face any penalties.

Waiting...

Primary School Principal assaulted

So, here we have another 4th paragraph phenomenon, this time taking until the 6th paragraph to identify the person doing the assaulting as being female.

I'm not sure whether it's that women today are more violent in general or if, much like today, they suppress details when a woman is the cause.  Either way, sucks to be men.

Left-wing media pushing anti-Australian agenda...still

So here we have a very emotive article posing as truth about the anti-Islam protests.

Notice how he glosses over how antagonistic the counter protesters were (many wore face masks to conceal their identities, something in itself that should be met with a degree of suspicion) in burning an Australian flag.  Oh no, it's the anti-Islam protesters who should be focused on for their reaction!

If a man burns a copy of the Koran and sees his house burnt down for it, does the media focus on the Muslims who lash out or on the man who shouldn't have disrespected the faith and beliefs of another culture?

Oh wait, that's right, the media has an agenda to follow, and follow they will.

Woman hit and run, media hides gender again

So here we have a tragic case of a woman who was knocked over in a hit and run and has ended up in hospital.

Of course, the media is doing its usual best to make sure we the public have lost interest in the story before we realize that it was actually a woman who was driving the car.

Notice how we never find out the name of the alleged driver, it's just "a 26 year old woman"...

Universities spreading Left-Wing agenda using Australian taxpayer dollars

Well, the (Left-Wing) Conversation has an article explaining why Universities branch out into other countries.

The truth is really more a case of the Universities are just trying to spread their Left-wing agenda into other countries using the money taken from Western students and governments to do so, but lets pretend it's all in the name of education.

Nothing to see here.