So, here's an article crying out about the domestic violence crisis. I wonder if anyone noticed a recent article about a mother who killed her two sons back in 2012. The article even goes on to defend her by painting her as a desperate woman who feared her husband taking her to India, despite the fact that she'd threatened to kill her children before she actually did. Notice how the article is centered around the questioning and grilling of the husband, the man who lost his whole family because of his ex-wife's malicious act and therefore a victim, as though it's somehow his fault.
So, apparently women need more protection from men, but children don't need any more protection from women?
One thing I did notice that, of the three cases being held up as examples of bad/evil men who have killed their partners in the first article, only one of them was Caucasian. Now, for many people that may be a case of "yes, but Victoria, Australia is a very multicultural state. My response to that is that the majority of the population is still Caucasian, but more importantly, that people of African and Asian background are in a minority. If 75% percent of the population is Caucasian, and if all races are equally likely to commit any crime, then 75% of the people held up as examples should have been Caucasian.
The leftist media, however, won't follow that path that will result in concluding that, on a percentage basis, that men of a certain ethnic background have a higher risk of partner violence (that would be racist), so they simply paint all men with the same brush. Much more fair.
Update - It's also interesting to note that one of the cases held up was actually drug (Ice) related, so should this be treated as a simple DV case or as a drug induced homicide?
It's still getting old that if a man does something while high/drunk then he's completely accountable, yet a woman plans on killing her children and follows through and they're grilling the father left behind like it's somehow his fault.
No comments:
Post a Comment